Randall Stross has an article in the NYT this morning suggesting that the book industry may soon get “Napsterized” — suffer the disastrous fate of the music industry, all because of piracy. This article performs revisionist history on the explicit actions of the music industry underlying its decline. Piracy has been a convenient culprit for media industries as their distribution shifts to digital, but it is not the only cause of their problems. It is largely a symptom of traditional market issues.
In the physical goods world, media companies maintain a monopoly over the distribution of their content. They control who can sell it, they price it at whatever level they deem appropriate and they determine if and when a consumer can buy it (think release windows). As all media goes digital, this monopoly quickly melts away. The content owner cannot control distribution (it’s too easy to copy a digital good) and as such they cannot control availability. When this control erodes, pricing pressure follows as consumers have a choice between buying and stealing.
The music industry, after the emergence of MP3 encoding in 1996, did not internalize this fundamental change. They believed they could maintain their monopoly on distribution by suing consumers who engaged in piracy, controlling release windows and limiting licenses to only a few digital outlets at the same prices of the physical goods. Consumers inherently knew that the digital good should be less expensive than the physical one (there are no hard good costs, after all) and demanded widespread access to digital downloads. It took the music industry seven long years until they broadly licensed Apple in 2003 with their full catalogs. In that time, consumers found the alternative — Napster, Gnutella and Bit Torrent. By the time iTunes took off, it was too late.
The book industry, with all this learning behind it, is making similar (but not identical) mistakes. They have licensed some of their catalog to a few eBook retailers. But there are still millions of titles not available for legitimate download. In addition, they have tried to hold pricing for the eBook at the same level as the physical book. Jeff Bezos knows consumers expect to pay less. So he subsidizes the price of eBooks in order to get the price to about $10 a book. When free is a few clicks away, convenience rules. The publishers should flood the market with their entire catalogs and price them at dramatically low prices. There should be hundreds of places to buy them online. They should make it painfully easy to buy an eBook, even risking the cannibalization of their physical books. They need to make the legitimate good superior to the pirated one.
The digital future for all media companies is likely a smaller market with inferior economics than the monopoly physical one they enjoyed for decades. To survive in this new world will require lower cost structures. But the result of not embracing this future are clear: just ask the music industry.
Well put. The digital conversations of the literary world remind me of those from the music world…of a while ago.
Best,
M
Well done teasing out the cause and effect of what happened to the music industry and how that translates to the book industry. The nice counterfactual is that if napster (or something similar) never appeared, or the music industry was able to thwart napster, would the music industry be any different now. If anything napster just accelerated the inevitable.
Thanks for your comments, David.
I hope you’ll be at FGVN. I didn’t get a chance to introduce myself last time so I’m looking forward meeting you and continuing this discussion.
Excellent! I agree!
[...] The Book Industry is in Trouble. But Piracy is Just a Symptom.Oh yeah, today’s topic is piracy and myths. [...]
Regarding pricing, Amazon is doing what’s best for Amazon. Since they are now larger than all of the publishers, they can do pretty much what they want to do. They are the new Walmart of retail, and they will treat their suppliers, and the creators, the same way. Price things the way we tell you to, or go away. This is not about freedom — it’s about monopoly capitalism.
Hi Booker, thanks for your comments. I do agree that Amazon is big and has lots of market power. But that power is derived from their ability to satisfy customers. They want prices low because they sell more books that way. Amazon is really, really good at maximizing profit which is what suppliers and retailers ultimately want. If you produced more profit by selling more units at lower prices, why keep prices high?
[...] Admit it. The Book Industry is in Trouble. But Piracy is Just a Symptom.. [...]
I have written two books and they are self-published, a choose I made because I have been following the publishing and book selling industry and it is in the midst of a big transformation and I want to time the events perfectly to protect my intellectual property. If anyone has suggestions out there, bring it on!
[...] more reading on this, see my post on piracy in the book industry, the movie industry ignoring market signals from Redbox, and a reminder of what we went through at [...]
Thank you for your insight. Now with Apple introducing their iPad, Amazon is having trouble holding their 9.99 price for ebooks. I would appreciate your insight and best guess as to the outcome of these current events. Thanks
In an effort to challenge Amazon, Apple (somewhat oddly) capitulated to the book publishers’ demands of higher price points. This, to me, is somewhat surprising because I think Steve Jobs has a very strong grasp on media pricing. Ultimately, as it will all play out, both will carry all eBooks and the publishers will probably succeed at demanding higher prices. But then I believe we will see piracy emerge as a real threat here.
I’m loving your blog. Most people I come across are either guilty pirates or respectable buyers. Never someone who puts it into perspective, ugh I just hate the arguments against piracy.
Oh what about the arthur, publisher, etc…
WHAT ABOUT THE PEOPLE, THEIR WASTING HARD EARNED CASH ON SOMETHING THAT COSTS RELATIVELY NO TIME, ENERGY, OR RESOURCES TO COPY AND DISTRIBUTE.
Outrageous
[...] Now, how do legacy book publishers fight back? Well, to begin, their biggest mistake prior to over-reaching on pricing was to insist retailers DRM their eBook titles. Just like in online music, this insistence on anti-copying protection (albeit with limited usefulness) not only creates inconveniences for consumers, it allows for dominant proprietary ecosystems to form (like Apple did with iPod/iTunes, where tracks bought from iTunes only played on iPods, Kindle books can only be read on Kindles.) Instead, publishers should have demanded the opposite. All eBooks should be sold in open, interoperable formats, so an eBook sold at Amazon could be read on a Nook, etc. This would have separated the reader market from the retail market and lessened Amazon’s eBook dominance. It may be too late for this change to work, but it is worth exploring. Incidentally, I predicted this in 2009 with this piece, “The Book Industry Is In Trouble, But Piracy Is Just A Symptom.” [...]