Disruption
David Pakman's Blog www.pakman.com

Why Netflix Won

Oct 26

Very few digital media upstarts have been able to build scale businesses in online entertainment. No startup has succeeded at scale in digital music (with only Apple and, barely, Amazon registering any level of success — these are hardly startups). In online video, clearly YouTube reached scale (but had no meaningful business) when it was acquired by Google and now, with Google’s help, will clearly reach scale as a business. In online movies/TV, of the “Five Guys” who seem poised to be meaningful (Apple, Google, Microsoft, Amazon and Netflix), only one is a startup, and it sure is an outlier. And an amazing outlier they are.

In examining how Netflix successfully navigated the perils of licensed entertainment content businesses, important and familiar lessons emerge.

The movie studios wanted Netflix dead. They hated the model from the beginning. Only problem was, they couldn’t kill them. Thanks to the first sale doctrine, codified in copyright law, a lawfully purchased DVD could be rented. So, when many of the studios didn’t want to play ball with Netflix and offer them discounts (or even wholesale pricing) on DVDs, Netflix just went to the store to buy them at retail. This allowed Netflix to get off the ground and assess market demand for their DVD-by-mail rental business without any approval or licenses from rights holders. CEO Reed Hastings’ gut proved right — a more consumer-friendly model of no late fees and big selection overpowered the immediate convenience of going to a corner store to pick up a movie for a night. He offered a better service for consumers against the strong will of the rights holders. And by building a great product, he was rewarded with massive consumer adoption. There are more than 15MM subscribers today, and growing.

Many analysts predicted the death of Netflix as the world shifted from DVD viewing to on-demand streaming. It wasn’t that people believed Netflix couldn’t develop a compelling streaming service. Many of us thought Netflix would whither because the studios/networks would never license them content on reasonable terms. There is no first sale doctrine in digital goods, so Netflix could not get into the streaming business without negotiating painful voluntary licenses with each rights holder. The studios had begun licensing services like Amazon’s Unbox, Apple and Microsoft with limited titles loaded with consumer unfriendly restrictions and pricing (movies can be rented for $3.99 or $4.99, must be watched within 30 days, and once started, will expire and become unwatchable after 24 hours!) Reed Hastings, with 15MM subscribers and growing knew those terms were largely a non-starter with the mass market. He had built a huge business based on customer convenience — pay once a month, watch as many movies as you can, and NO restrictions! Keep a movie as long as you want!

So, it seems Netflix could either stay out of the streaming business or license limited content like everyone else with lots of restrictions. And this is where Netflix beat the odds. They knew the two main weaknesses of studios and networks: (1) big money talks — they are motivated by short-term profit and (2) the profit participants (directors, actors, writers, showrunners) will exert pressure when big offers are put in front of studios/networks.

As Netflix grew in size, an interesting thing happened — they were massive patrons of the postal service by spending a few billion dollars a year on postage. They reasoned they could simply shift that expense to content owners and have as good or better a business. When they waived a $1B check in front of the studios eyes, suddenly all those restrictions on pricing and limited viewing went away. Netflix used some great negotiating savvy to offer really big numbers to studios in total, but also big per-episode and per-movie-title guarantees. This allowed the profit participants to put pressure on the studios/networks to take the deal. Because Netflix can influence the shows we watch, they can afford to overpay on a per episode basis for hit shows to help with customer acquisition, but can steer us to lower-cost programming once we become members.

In short, Netflix developed great economic leverage with the rights owners — and that is the only way to force them to do deals that allow both customers to be delighted and also leave enough margin for startups to build a business. Without the first sale doctrine, however, Netflix never would have gotten there. And once they got leverage, they played their cards perfectly.

Can We Please Fix Online Calendaring?

Oct 25

I have a proposal to make: I will pay for roundtrip tickets and hotel rooms if the product managers of Apple’s iCal, Microsoft’s Outlook and Exchange/ActiveSync, Google Calendar and Lotus Notes will all agree to get together in the same room and make cross-application calendaring work once and for all. It is completely ridiculous that the nature of online scheduling is to send someone an appointment/invitiation and pray that it gets on their calendar and stays there. Nevermind the fact that time zone support is erratic. In case you are not as disappointed as I am with the state of online calendaring, let me list many of the shortcomings:

  • Generally, within a single system environment (Microsoft Exchange, say), users all on the same system can send and receive calendar appointments and they reliably show up on the recipients’ calendars, changes are propagated, and RSVP information is returned to the originator
  • Once you have a need to include someone else in that invite list, say, someone at another company on a different Exchange server, someone who uses Google Calendar, or even someone on a Mac/iCal using ActiveSync to connect to an Exchange server, it is hit or miss (usually miss) as to whether that appointment will get on their calendar or not (and stay there).
  • I use Apple’s iCal, have no “local” calendars, and only connect to my company’s Exchange calendar using ActiveSync, which is built in to Mac OS X Snow Leopard 10.6. When I receive a calendar invite from someone on Google Calendar, or even another exchange server, the invite fails with an error and never gets on to my calendar, even if I accept it.
  • Time zones are just plain broken. If I am traveling this wednesday to San Francisco, and say so on my calendar, the calendar should adapt when advanced appointments are being scheduled.

These things are just not that hard to fix. It seems the biggest issue is the fact that calendaring is done on a file basis. When I send you an appointment, some attachment is included in an email (.ics, etc.) which is a status at a moment in time. This is broken also by the fact that we access our calendars from many different devices. We don’t want to depend on that attachment reaching all of our devices. Better still would be a webservice that manages the ongoing status of an appointment to which all of our local calendars subscribe. This is what happens with CalDav calendar subscriptions today, but that is a one-to-many solution to date. I am sure smarter people than I have thought of this and offered solutions. Clearly, this is eminently solvable and needed. So, entrepreneurs, show us the way!

Author David Pakman
Category Startups
Comments 14 Comments